Hurricane
Katrina : Bipartisan betrayal
Failure
to prioritize anyone's needs but their own is to be expected of the
mendacious, cunning Bush regime. But the wretchedness and misery
endured by people in the southern US states abandoned to their fate
after hurricane Katrina has broader aspects too. The apparent absence
of even provisional civil defense structure or organization indicates
how far the US has declined into a corrupt one-party state, mired in
federal and local negligence and incompetence, incapable of throwing
off the racist legacy of slavery. Katrina has shown that the US is a
banana republic on steroids -- the poor endure deprivation and
insecurity while the rich party and make war.
Katrina and Mitch
People who lived through
hurricane Mitch in Central America in 1998 puzzle at the abject failure
to care for people in the US after Katrina. When Mitch hit Central
America in October seven years ago, the effects of rains hundreds of
miles from the eye of the hurricane had a similar impact to that of the
breaking levees in New Orleans. Hundreds of thousands of people in
towns and rural communities found themselves flooded out and cut off
for days and weeks. Some parallels with Katrina hold good.
For example, no one really knew
the gravity of what was happening to the affected regional population
for several days. People around the world knew the disaster had hit
Honduras badly a day or so later. But few understood that it was a
massive regional disaster until the Monday or Tuesday, four or five
days on. An Irish journalist calling from Dublin at the time was told
by a leading aid agency in the Honduran capital, Tegucigalpa,
“Nicaragua?...no, nothing's happening there...” On the following
Tuesday they began pulling over a thousand bodies from the mud at
Posoltega on the Nicaraguan Pacific Coast.
That similar ignorance could
prevail in the case of New Orleans only demonstrates that the US
political and media elite -- not just the Bush regime itself -- really
do regard predominantly black and Hispanic people in the US as of no
more interest than people in distant developing countries. How ironic
and paradoxical that the response of the Central American communities
ravaged by Mitch should have been, almost universally, incomparably
more humane and practical than that of the local authorities in New
Orleans. Certainly in Nicaragua, the central government response to
Mitch was as pathetic as that of the Bush regime to the disaster in New
Orleans.
Municipal Authority, Coordinated
Civil Defense
That meant local municipal
authorities bore the burden of caring for tens of thousands of people
in their respective areas for weeks. Unlike in New Orleans, they met
that challenge well. In northern Nicaragua local emergency committees
worked day and night for over a month without significant external
material aid. The Mitch-induced floods washed away crucial arterial
crossings at Tipitapa, Sebaco and Jicaro, cutting off northern
Nicaragua completely.
In response, local mayors sat
down with army commanders, police and fire service officers, local
business and church people. Municipal officials well used to coping
with next to no resources made good on their obligations to people in
their care. Where I was, in a city with a population of around 120,000,
we were lucky because the electricity was on at least sporadically and
the phone lines stayed up. The banks continued to work, although they
were virtually empty for days, and the local Central Bank office had
enough bank notes to supply demand. All that meant people could arrange
and access funds wired from overseas.
In the three days after Mitch
hit the city, over ten thousand people were displaced from their homes.
They were accommodated in schools and other public buildings. Every
night the emergency committee reviewed needs in each refuge and
coordinated delivery of available supplies. Local businesses either
donated foodstuffs, soap, bleach and toilet paper, diapers and baby
bottles or sold them at cost price or below. Hundreds of local
individuals donated cash or food, clothes, bedding and medicine in kind.
It wasn't all brotherly and
sisterly. Some businesses tried to raise prices to take advantage of
shortages. Some pro-government officials boycotted the emergency
committee because the mayor was Sandinista. Government medical
authorities refused to release medicines stored in their warehouses. I
remember vividly being solicited by the head of the local central
health center -- responsible for the whole city -- for help to buy
medicines as we stood in the rain-drenched queue for the temporary
river crossing where 100 meters of road washed away. The bridge, built
by a US company forty years before, survived intact.
Almost every relevant need was
organized. Local radio stations broadcast messages constantly helping
families keep in touch and reassure loved ones. Fuel was rationed
pending the arrival of tankers to replenish the gas stations, who could
say when? An aid agency based near the Honduran border had one of its
jeeps with four of its workers stranded. They were allocated fuel from
the emergency committee to deliver food and medicines around the local
area until the town's army battalion blasted landslides blocking the
road north allowing them to get back to their head office, fording
every single river on the way.
“Bipartisan” Class and Race War
on the Poor
A similar civic spirit was
clearly active following Katrina. But it lacked well-organized civil
defense structures to be really effective. Tens of thousands people
were marooned without adequate care for over a week. That was not just
a failure of central government but a failure of local leadership too
-- the result of a rotten political and social system, emblematic of a
society in decline.
A comparison with the experience
in Honduras, Nicaragua and El Salvador after Mitch suggests brave and
good people doing their best in New Orleans were let down as much by
their municipal authorities and wealthy fellow citizens as by national
government. The best human responses cannot make good notional
democratic process gutted of real meaning and the absence of a
political culture that foments collective solidarity. On the contrary,
the US political system openly promotes class and race warfare through
its taxation and criminal justice policies.
“Bipartisan” is a misnomer in
this context. That failure is integral to the corporate one-party
neo-liberal confidence trick the US people have swallowed for decades
now. Until last week the single-party plutocracy that is the United
States had a “bipartisan” policy of funding the illegal Israeli
occupation of Palestine and invading Afghanistan and Iraq while leaving
Louisiana and Mississippi vulnerable to hurricanes. The tens of
thousands of people abandoned and neglected for a week are a damning
indictment of a one-party political system suborned by giant
corporations and foreign interests.
The gargantuan US military
budget is funded mostly by Chinese and Japanese purchase of US
government debt. The US cannot pay its way. It functions as a kind of
mercenary macho hit man for a global corporate elite. The catastrophic
power failures affecting the northeastern United States and
southeastern Canada a couple of years ago already showed infrastructure
investment in the US is in crisis. Katrina showed that up again. But
the US plutocrat elite will fight policy reversal as hard as they can.
Katrina Aftermath -- Corporate
Welfare, Cosmetic Change
It is not just Bush, Cheney,
Rumsfeld, Rice and the corporate interests they represent who profit
enormously from disasters like Katrina and from spiraling fuel prices.
Plenty of Democrats with a stake in big oil will benefit as well.
Relentless increases in the market price for oil are exacerbated by
“bipartisan” military action in Iraq and threats against Iran.
The “bipartisan” failure to
protect the port and communications infrastructure of New Orleans will
push oil prices up further. Adding to the overall corporate
pork-from-heaven, Cheney's corporate buddies at Halliburton are already
reported to have been assigned port reconstruction work in New Orleans.
No doubt Democrat-linked corporate carnivores will get their bloated
share of the Louisiana carcass as well.
In the medium term, Katrina may
or may not signify some kind of watershed when a majority in the US
finally wake up to the delinquency of their ruling classes and attempt
to arrest their decline as a society. Immediately, little good is
likely to come. The Bush regime will exaggerate the blame they can
reasonably assign to state and municipal authorities. The Democrats
will help gloss over the systemic failures. The corporate media will
help Congress rehearse theatricals of outrage and inquiry. The Bush
regime will work fast to up the ante with yet more imperial adventures
overseas in Iran or in Venezuela.